|
2#
樓主 |
發表於 2008-11-26 21:59:05
|
只看該作者
IV. CONCLUSION
# n- k% s" e( B0 p" bThe designs with 3-stage-inverter and 1-stage-inverter ^' N5 T/ y8 j9 [( h3 c# L ?( ?( X
controlling circuits have been studied to verify the optimal: B b& g Z3 X- D
design schemes in NMOS-based power-rail ESD clamp9 w: G2 J R/ q
circuits. In addition, two ESD clamp NMOS transistors,# s7 n6 d T$ s' ^, q
having snapback and no snapback operations, also were codesigned
3 g' j$ i1 [7 W0 p% i3 h) ]8 z5 b! Vwith different controlling circuits to realize the
. \- l, |* j( E v* y7 V* ^3 D2 oimpact on their required performance. According to the
' k7 o7 ^( e5 p( A s* [experiments and analyses, the 3-stage inverters can slightly6 y/ V F6 W2 }6 q6 _
increase the ESD robustness, but they also can dramatically
, h/ l9 I5 M9 I5 R5 Y0 m8 J3 Dsacrifice the mis-trigger and latch-on immunity. The 1-stage
+ v8 i) ^. e7 H- J1 uinverter should be an appropriate and reliable candidate for the
0 n. k/ R2 `" n$ k' @4 }) J2 bpower-rail ESD clamp circuits. |
|