|
2#
樓主 |
發表於 2008-11-26 21:59:05
|
只看該作者
IV. CONCLUSION
6 t7 N) f! D! ^& T5 h/ @1 m7 \The designs with 3-stage-inverter and 1-stage-inverter
; I" K: J' |% s! E8 Dcontrolling circuits have been studied to verify the optimal V' e" v% C0 I
design schemes in NMOS-based power-rail ESD clamp
8 z( V! x. \; r% b+ Scircuits. In addition, two ESD clamp NMOS transistors, Z6 V! P8 n) y7 @) _" C
having snapback and no snapback operations, also were codesigned+ Q3 b' l* A1 o' h$ L o
with different controlling circuits to realize the
+ R3 d# Q! ]6 d, O# \/ Mimpact on their required performance. According to the
% E7 ?7 X$ T) l: t4 Q2 L4 Eexperiments and analyses, the 3-stage inverters can slightly; L$ k, p5 M1 O- D
increase the ESD robustness, but they also can dramatically& O+ l/ Y* g* F* K, K
sacrifice the mis-trigger and latch-on immunity. The 1-stage! p: U% w& p5 m
inverter should be an appropriate and reliable candidate for the5 g7 `" m# L3 h$ N3 J
power-rail ESD clamp circuits. |
|