|
1. Open source solution,以Openswan/freeswan與OpenVPN為主。其產品所需的軟體功能有哪一些?
" W# }# {, c8 T( u9 S; |Freeswan: stop develop (stable IPSec)2 w7 j# W! p$ m2 S; R+ C6 q! r9 E# `
Openswan: still develop (stable IPSec); B/ |0 a, B0 g- d
OpenVPN: open source SSL (user layser SSL)* G# r7 V! o4 c3 T. c* a# u* o
2. Chip vendor solution 例如:Cavium有SDK solution,不用付費但其功能有哪些?
2 H% P; `& Y! F0 G' t8 N' @而SafeNet的SDK solution則需要付費,有哪些人有用過的經驗?其軟體的整合規格為何?
2 L1 {8 q+ x9 F4 x! Y0 H, c8 YUsing SOC is better. Such as Intel IXP4xx, Broadcom, Realtek SoC.
/ P4 f8 k" J" CSafenet and Cavium SDK is too expensive for SOHO product7 ~) u0 B" O% [& ?8 v- S
3. propritary的software VPN stack。每家ODM的功能有所不同,其所需要的軟體支援與相關整合介面如何?; U- K$ @$ j: j: ?+ A' t$ W( e% d
It is hard to integrate different software vendor's VPN stack due to lack of standard API |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|